EDA wants to stop traffic light labeling

By Jim Cornall

- Last updated on GMT

The EDA says the traffic light system means diet soda ranks better than milk. Pic:©GettyImages/RightOne
The EDA says the traffic light system means diet soda ranks better than milk. Pic:©GettyImages/RightOne

Related tags Nutrition

The European Dairy Association (EDA) says it supports consumers’ rights to be fully informed on the nutritional properties of foods, but the proposed traffic light labeling system by the Evolved Nutrition Labelling Initiative (ENL) is not adequate for providing information on the global nutritional properties of milk and dairy products.

The EDA said it believes voluntary labeling schemes used in addition to the nutrition declaration required by the EU law can be a useful additional tool for consumers if they fulfil a number of important criteria: such a scheme should look at the food as a whole and support foods rich in essential nutrients.

It added a good voluntary labeling scheme should be evaluated, have a significant positive impact on consumer behavior and public health, be compatible with EU legislation and be supported by stakeholders.

ENL proposals ignore nutrients

The EDA said the traffic lights scheme proposal by six multi-national food companies in the ENL does not fulfil these requirements and is not an adequate system for milk and dairy products.

ENL companies

The Coca-Cola Company
Mondelez International

The EDA noted the proposal is an extension of the color-coded UK traffic light system but with reference values including portions (and not only on 100g).

The proposed system includes the content of fat, saturated fat, sugar and salt, however the EDA argues this ignores positive nutrients such as protein, vitamins and minerals.

“Such a selective approach does not recognize the importance of nutrient-dense foods as recommended in dietary recommendations, nor does it help consumers to compose a balanced and varied diet with nutritious foods,”​ the EDA said.

The EDA argued the UK traffic light system has not changed consumer behavior, and said no study so far proves that color-coded and ‘negative nutrient’ based schemes help to improve public health.

Not appropriate for dairy

EDA secretary general, Alexander Anton, said the proposed ENL scheme as currently presented has not been adapted to acknowledge nutrient-rich foods and therefore is not adequate for milk and dairy products.

The EDA said the traffic light system creates confusing messages and possible errors in consumer understanding: it will encourage consumption of soft drinks compared to milk, or salted biscuits compared to cheese.

“We believe that systems which are worth further discussion and consideration by the interested stakeholders could be e.g. the Australian Health Star Rating scheme or Choices International logo,”​ the EDA stated.

“There is seriously something wrong with a scheme where a diet soda drink ranks better than drinking milk,”​ Anton concluded.

Related news