INC asks for power to restrict NZ infant formula marketing practices

By Mark ASTLEY contact

- Last updated on GMT

INC asks for power to restrict NZ infant formula marketing practices

Related tags: Infant formula, Milk, Breastfeeding

The Infant Nutrition Council (INC) has asked the New Zealand Commerce Commission to grant it the authority to restrict the infant formula marketing practices of its members. 

The Commerce Commission announced today that INC has applied for permission to enforce the marketing restrictions detailed in its INC Code of Practice for Marketing of Infant Formula (INC Code of Practice).

The voluntary INC Code of Practice - signed by all INC members - relates to the marketing of infant formula products for infants up to the age of six months. 

In line with the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Code of Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes (WHO Code), the INC Code of Practice prohibits infant formula advertising, the distribution of gifts or free samples to pregnant mothers or caregivers, and the offer of incentives to health professionals in exchange for the promotion of infant formula. 

INC, which represents the interests of of infant formula stakeholders in New Zealand and Australia, including Fonterra, Nestlé, Nutricia, and Heinz, has asked that the Commerce Commission provide it the power to enforce its Code of Practice.

It fears otherwise that INC members, driven by the activities of non-members “may be incentivised to increase their own marketing.”

"While INC members have been committed to restriction of the type embodied in the INC Code of Practice and its predecessor (the NZIFMA Code of Practice) for some time, in the event that there was any increase, however small, in marketing by an industry participant, each INC member would have to reassess its position,"​ said INC.

"Committed" to WHO Code

Granting it this authority will, INC claims, gift health officials in New Zealand time to push through mandatory regulations.

The WHO Code, devised in 1981 to to protect and promote breastfeeding and restrict the marketing of breast milk substitutes, was adopted on a voluntary basis by New Zealand in 1983.

Twenty years on, the New Zealand Ministry of Health is, according to INC, "committed to giving effect to the WHO Code."

“The Ministry of Health states that implementing the WHO Code is an important part of creating an overall environment that enables mothers to make the best possible feeding choice, based on impartial information free of commercial influence, and to be fully supported in doing so,​” said INC. 

“However, for a period of time before the Ministry of Health is able to impose the restriction, it would be clear to all members of the Infant Nutrition Council that they would not, and could not, be bound by relevant restrictions in the INC Code of Practice.”

"Lessen competition"

The INC application was filed with the Commerce Commission under Section 58 of the New Zealand Commerce Act, which enables it to grant authorisation for restrictive trade practices. 

In its application, INC acknowledged that such restrictions would "lessen competition by depriving manufacturers and marketers of infant formula the opportunity to consider methods of marketing and communication."

It insists, however, that "the public benefit to be gained from the arrangement outweighs the lessening in competition."

Click here​ to read the INC application.

 

 

 

 

Related topics: Regulation & Safety, Nutritionals

Related news

Show more

2 comments

Link to INC application not working

Posted by Jim,

Your Link to INC application at bottom of article is not working

Report abuse

Totally unnecesary

Posted by Jim,

This is a restrictive practice foisted on other manufacturers and brand owners by a cosy cabal of big boys. The WHO already has a code of practice and all that is needed is for that to be policed. Countries own Health Authorities should do that.
If The Infant Nutrition Council wants to adopt their own voluntary code of practice that is up to them but I see a real danger in them being policeman.

Report abuse

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars